Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New listings
New media comments
New resources
New calendar events
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Calendar
New events
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Classifieds
New listings
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping
Beekeeping ombudsman
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Welcome to NZ Beekeepers+
Would you like to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.
Sign up
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bron" data-source="post: 13480" data-attributes="member: 59"><p>We are in changing times. I printed and only skim read the first couple of pages of the “updated” DECA, I put it in the read and do later pile. I noted, as mentioned, the multiple choice, and filed it in the back of my brain marked interesting. I’m going to read it thoroughly & fill it out when I finish this post.</p><p></p><p>I hope that with the greater transparency that the AFBPMA has been using after all the publicity that they are looking closely at all their processes, as they seem to be sharing them a lot more freely. I’ve had multiple deliveries of their processes through email, text message and Facebook links. I was impressed, and really felt the agency was trying hard despite the privacy limitation. I had a fairly good understanding prior to this as I’m the “paperwork” Queen in our business. (Being in education was a good training ground and no one else wanted the job), and I’ve always tried to learn something new every day, knowledge is useful when faced with general uncertainty. The other two are happy just to get on with the “real” job and don’t want a bar of it.</p><p></p><p>I agree with John that something needs to change so that trust is restored and there is better clarity within the industry and the masses who without knowing the first thing about a subject seem to jump on any band wagon and try and ride it towards their pet destination. We need to look at what we have and ask, “Is it still fit for purpose, do we need change?” Maybe we can see this occurring now.</p><p></p><p>Would an ombudsman work, I don’t know. Can we afford it, would the whole trust it, I don’t know that either. I’ve always believed that to do nothing implies consent. If you feel passionate then you should do everything you can to change perception.</p><p></p><p>I’m in.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bron, post: 13480, member: 59"] We are in changing times. I printed and only skim read the first couple of pages of the “updated” DECA, I put it in the read and do later pile. I noted, as mentioned, the multiple choice, and filed it in the back of my brain marked interesting. I’m going to read it thoroughly & fill it out when I finish this post. I hope that with the greater transparency that the AFBPMA has been using after all the publicity that they are looking closely at all their processes, as they seem to be sharing them a lot more freely. I’ve had multiple deliveries of their processes through email, text message and Facebook links. I was impressed, and really felt the agency was trying hard despite the privacy limitation. I had a fairly good understanding prior to this as I’m the “paperwork” Queen in our business. (Being in education was a good training ground and no one else wanted the job), and I’ve always tried to learn something new every day, knowledge is useful when faced with general uncertainty. The other two are happy just to get on with the “real” job and don’t want a bar of it. I agree with John that something needs to change so that trust is restored and there is better clarity within the industry and the masses who without knowing the first thing about a subject seem to jump on any band wagon and try and ride it towards their pet destination. We need to look at what we have and ask, “Is it still fit for purpose, do we need change?” Maybe we can see this occurring now. Would an ombudsman work, I don’t know. Can we afford it, would the whole trust it, I don’t know that either. I’ve always believed that to do nothing implies consent. If you feel passionate then you should do everything you can to change perception. I’m in. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What type of honey is New Zealand famous for?
Post reply
Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping
Beekeeping ombudsman
Top
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…