Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New listings
New media comments
New resources
New calendar events
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Calendar
New events
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Classifieds
New listings
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping
Conference feedback
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Welcome to NZ Beekeepers+
Would you like to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.
Sign up
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NickWallingford" data-source="post: 5077" data-attributes="member: 44"><p>I can say without having to hesitate that the results presented by [USER=233]@JohnF[/USER], both live and then on the poster, provided a highlight for me from the days in Rotorua. I lack the practical experience of varroa, and something of a (personal) lack of interest in gene manipulations, that this work of [USER=233]@JohnF[/USER] 's made for a combination of defensible science, combined with obvious application and practicability in both the short and medium term. </p><p></p><p>His work describes, basically, using a swab at the colony entrance and then qPCR to identify the likelihood that the hive has, or soon will have, clinical symptoms. Amazing effectiveness, for a very practical and easy to use process. </p><p></p><p>But it gets better! Instead of swabbing and analysing on a 'per hive' basis, John has extended into composite sampling - using the same swab on a number of hives. It won't identify which particular hive(s) of the group of hives might have AFB spores at a high level, but the potential for quickly screening an entire yard at a time for AFB with have use. Not only by the beekeeper, but by the Management Agency as a means of cost effectively screening without necessarily visually inspecting each hive in the first place. If the results come back with positive AFB results, then the hive by hive inspections would take place. </p><p></p><p>I've heard a lot of neat processes and innovations for beekeeping. Often the 'real' value seems to still be too many years into the future for me to appreciate (I'm an old guy, remember). I'd like to think that this methodology might be able to make some differences into the *near* future... </p><p></p><p>Thank you, John Mackay and Barry Forster. I think you've provided some of the new tools that can have the confidence of beekeepers and lead us into a better outcome for AFB elimination in NZ.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NickWallingford, post: 5077, member: 44"] I can say without having to hesitate that the results presented by [USER=233]@JohnF[/USER], both live and then on the poster, provided a highlight for me from the days in Rotorua. I lack the practical experience of varroa, and something of a (personal) lack of interest in gene manipulations, that this work of [USER=233]@JohnF[/USER] 's made for a combination of defensible science, combined with obvious application and practicability in both the short and medium term. His work describes, basically, using a swab at the colony entrance and then qPCR to identify the likelihood that the hive has, or soon will have, clinical symptoms. Amazing effectiveness, for a very practical and easy to use process. But it gets better! Instead of swabbing and analysing on a 'per hive' basis, John has extended into composite sampling - using the same swab on a number of hives. It won't identify which particular hive(s) of the group of hives might have AFB spores at a high level, but the potential for quickly screening an entire yard at a time for AFB with have use. Not only by the beekeeper, but by the Management Agency as a means of cost effectively screening without necessarily visually inspecting each hive in the first place. If the results come back with positive AFB results, then the hive by hive inspections would take place. I've heard a lot of neat processes and innovations for beekeeping. Often the 'real' value seems to still be too many years into the future for me to appreciate (I'm an old guy, remember). I'd like to think that this methodology might be able to make some differences into the *near* future... Thank you, John Mackay and Barry Forster. I think you've provided some of the new tools that can have the confidence of beekeepers and lead us into a better outcome for AFB elimination in NZ. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What type of honey is New Zealand famous for?
Post reply
Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping
Conference feedback
Top
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…