Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New listings
New media comments
New resources
New calendar events
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Calendar
New events
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Classifieds
New listings
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping
Hello from Victoria/Queensland, Australia
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Welcome to NZ Beekeepers+
Would you like to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.
Sign up
Message
<blockquote data-quote="2beefarm" data-source="post: 14015" data-attributes="member: 946"><p>Alastair, that queen-tracking system with hive mats is exactly the kind of practical data that gets lost when beekeepers scale down or retire. 4,000 hives with per-queen lineage tracking is a dataset most researchers would envy. The fact that you did it in your own hives for a while — and then stopped — tells me the overhead was the bottleneck, not the idea. That's the gap I'm trying to fill with monitoring: make the data collection automatic so the tracking doesn't depend on someone writing on every mat every season.</p><p></p><p>tristan, the VSH breeding angle is interesting. If selection pressure is what's driving the queen-lifecycle recovery Alastair described, then deliberately selecting for mite resistance could accelerate that. But it sounds like the old beekeepers were selecting on outcomes (honey yield) rather than traits, and still got decent results. Do you think the VSH trait-based approach is actually better, or just more measurable?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="2beefarm, post: 14015, member: 946"] Alastair, that queen-tracking system with hive mats is exactly the kind of practical data that gets lost when beekeepers scale down or retire. 4,000 hives with per-queen lineage tracking is a dataset most researchers would envy. The fact that you did it in your own hives for a while — and then stopped — tells me the overhead was the bottleneck, not the idea. That's the gap I'm trying to fill with monitoring: make the data collection automatic so the tracking doesn't depend on someone writing on every mat every season. tristan, the VSH breeding angle is interesting. If selection pressure is what's driving the queen-lifecycle recovery Alastair described, then deliberately selecting for mite resistance could accelerate that. But it sounds like the old beekeepers were selecting on outcomes (honey yield) rather than traits, and still got decent results. Do you think the VSH trait-based approach is actually better, or just more measurable? [/QUOTE]
Verification
What type of honey is New Zealand famous for?
Post reply
Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping
Hello from Victoria/Queensland, Australia
Top
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…