Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New listings
New media comments
New resources
New calendar events
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Calendar
New events
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Classifieds
New listings
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Disease & Pests
No evidence to support the use of glycerol–oxalic acid mixtures delivered via paper towel
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Welcome to NZ Beekeepers+
Would you like to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.
Sign up
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tristan" data-source="post: 13491" data-attributes="member: 30"><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article/23/6/18/7458957#428710546[/URL]</p><p></p><p>this seams to be a bit of a weird study. maybe you science guys can help me out here. </p><p>their graph seams to show the oxalic acid working but claim "no statically evidence". can someone explain the math on that?</p><p></p><p>however this whole study is weird. </p><p>first of all its shop towels not paper towels (blue shop towels are synthetic).</p><p>but the big ones is that they are using shop towels which even randy oliver went away from some ~5 years ago (now its swedish sponge, maximizer pads, even cardboard strips). ie they are testing something thats known to work poorly.</p><p>also only testing at low acid rates (the highest they tested was 18g), similar to the early testing many years ago now. these days its around 50g.</p><p>the whole study is on a method that was only a step in the evolution quite some time ago.</p><p></p><p>if anything this study reinforces not using out of date methods that have long since replaced with better ones.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tristan, post: 13491, member: 30"] [URL unfurl="true"]https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article/23/6/18/7458957#428710546[/URL] this seams to be a bit of a weird study. maybe you science guys can help me out here. their graph seams to show the oxalic acid working but claim "no statically evidence". can someone explain the math on that? however this whole study is weird. first of all its shop towels not paper towels (blue shop towels are synthetic). but the big ones is that they are using shop towels which even randy oliver went away from some ~5 years ago (now its swedish sponge, maximizer pads, even cardboard strips). ie they are testing something thats known to work poorly. also only testing at low acid rates (the highest they tested was 18g), similar to the early testing many years ago now. these days its around 50g. the whole study is on a method that was only a step in the evolution quite some time ago. if anything this study reinforces not using out of date methods that have long since replaced with better ones. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What type of honey is New Zealand famous for?
Post reply
Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Disease & Pests
No evidence to support the use of glycerol–oxalic acid mixtures delivered via paper towel
Top
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…