Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New listings
New media comments
New resources
New calendar events
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Calendar
New events
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Classifieds
New listings
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Forums
Bees in the Media
Springbank Honey forced to burn thousands of beehives
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Welcome to NZ Beekeepers+
Would you like to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.
Sign up
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NickWallingford" data-source="post: 13448" data-attributes="member: 44"><p>From what the Mgmt Agency said, a decision to act on something other than clinical symptoms of AFB would (1) only be made by an AP1 (not one of the AP2 inspectors that you generally deal with) and (2) only happen after a combined history of increasing AFB findings and multiple instances of serious non-compliance. Given the recently publicised instance I am confident that the Mgmt Agency will have ensured a well-documented decision process. </p><p></p><p>The Foster Test has the potential to be a real game-changer for the PMP. Testing honey and bees with a culturing method has been accepted as 'valid'. I believe qPCR has the potential to both inform a bkpr about a hive's likelihood of clinical signs, as well as provide the PMP with a tool to be used as has seemingly been done in this case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NickWallingford, post: 13448, member: 44"] From what the Mgmt Agency said, a decision to act on something other than clinical symptoms of AFB would (1) only be made by an AP1 (not one of the AP2 inspectors that you generally deal with) and (2) only happen after a combined history of increasing AFB findings and multiple instances of serious non-compliance. Given the recently publicised instance I am confident that the Mgmt Agency will have ensured a well-documented decision process. The Foster Test has the potential to be a real game-changer for the PMP. Testing honey and bees with a culturing method has been accepted as 'valid'. I believe qPCR has the potential to both inform a bkpr about a hive's likelihood of clinical signs, as well as provide the PMP with a tool to be used as has seemingly been done in this case. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What type of honey is New Zealand famous for?
Post reply
Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Forums
Bees in the Media
Springbank Honey forced to burn thousands of beehives
Top
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…