Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New listings
New media comments
New resources
New calendar events
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Calendar
New events
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Classifieds
New listings
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Forums
Commercial Beekeeping in New Zealand
Who's in ApiNZ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Welcome to NZ Beekeepers+
Would you like to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.
Sign up
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dennis Crowley" data-source="post: 3140" data-attributes="member: 63"><p>You are correct Nick, in fact the NBA rule was way more open to interpretation by lawyers if it ever became necessary by either party, if there was ever a need to use it. APINZ just clarified what was the intent of that clause.</p><p>Tommy has forgotten to put in the clause properly, but I'm not surprised, it reads ;</p><p>5.2 All members shall promote the interests and object of the association and shall do nothing to bring the association into disrepute. Refer to clause 7.4.</p><p>7.4 Talks about giving the person who might decide to go against clause 5.2, after the board lets them know why they feel a breach has happened and also gives that person an opportunity in either writing or in person as to why, and then a decision will be made after that.</p><p>Nothing like a silencing clause, but you know what they say, never let the truth get in the way of a good put down, ah tommy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dennis Crowley, post: 3140, member: 63"] You are correct Nick, in fact the NBA rule was way more open to interpretation by lawyers if it ever became necessary by either party, if there was ever a need to use it. APINZ just clarified what was the intent of that clause. Tommy has forgotten to put in the clause properly, but I'm not surprised, it reads ; 5.2 All members shall promote the interests and object of the association and shall do nothing to bring the association into disrepute. Refer to clause 7.4. 7.4 Talks about giving the person who might decide to go against clause 5.2, after the board lets them know why they feel a breach has happened and also gives that person an opportunity in either writing or in person as to why, and then a decision will be made after that. Nothing like a silencing clause, but you know what they say, never let the truth get in the way of a good put down, ah tommy. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What type of honey is New Zealand famous for?
Post reply
Forums
New Zealand Beekeeping Forums
Commercial Beekeeping in New Zealand
Who's in ApiNZ?
Top
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…