i suspect thats a BOT or AI post. usually its a spammer setting up an account to spam from. i get them on other forums.Hassan is that based on US experience or stuff you have read from overseas?
i suspect thats a BOT or AI post. usually its a spammer setting up an account to spam from. i get them on other forums.Hassan is that based on US experience or stuff you have read from overseas?
I do not think there is one treatment that only has positive effects. If such a treatment existed no one would look for alternatives. But it does not, or at least I do not think we are aware of any, hence our quest for alternatives. I have exclusively experience with Oxalic acid/Glycerol strips largely made following Otto's description available on this forum, with modifications. I felt confident with that approach because we are only a few km's apart so our environments are similar. But because of this one-approach-only-experience I can't compare effects between this treatment and other ones. And even if I had that experience .. the variables are infinite.
All I can say is that over 5 years I never lost a hive to Varroa, even as a novice beekeeper I had one pulling through that had more than 12,000 mites and only OA/GLY was used, it pulled through easily, no thanks to my late detection of the mite invasion.
It is natural and healthy that alternatives are met with healthy criticism. After all we hope for something better and do not like to risk the bees. But none of us know all that there is to be known or even all that may be relevant to a new treatment set up. In my opinion, we can achieve progress by exchanging information of experiences rather than from dogmatic prescriptions.
It is easy to describe one approach and (sometimes rightfully so) be enthused about that approach, but NZ has so many different conditions, climates and microclimates, seasons, bees even, let alone beekeepers and also every year is different. So describing detailed procedures like Tristan did, like Otto did and many others here on the forum and in NZ is really necessary and very useful, but then there are so many details we do not even realise. I hesitate for that reason to share recipes because they may only work "here".
And then there is hearsay which is a always, with all the best of intentions, a derivative of the actual story.
Oxalic acid treatment is in fact a collection of treatments and sometimes mentioned and judged without describing how the active component was applied; each of these will have its own quirks. Drawing firm conclusions about what is best IN GENERAL is tough, if not impossible.
I try to keep observing the colonies when they are being treated and compare different OA/GLY strip recipes. Sometimes you think something works perhaps a little better, as in the mites fall more rapidly, but then again, that hive may have been in a more or less sunny spot, they certainly have different queens and micro genetics at least.
For myself I know I can only try, make mistakes, get up and try more and harder. I think it is called beekeeping
i suspect thats a BOT or AI post. usually its a spammer setting up an account to spam from. i get them on other forums.
No catch at all about this Tristan. Otto put his recipe and method up a couple of years ago. You can see it here: Document: - Making Staples-Ottocatch is we need to know that recipe and the results so we can start filling in the blanks.
its not about what recipe works but rather understanding how and why it works. once you know that you can make it suit your situation. in fact thats exactly what beekeeping is. you do not follow a recipe, you do what suits the situation and every hive is a different situation.
at the moment there is a fair bit of information, thanks to randy oliver and others who have spent the time, expense and the bees to properly test things out. but with our situation being a little bit different, those differences need testing. a lot of beeks here have done really well so far, tested a lot, it just needs the last bits finished off.
with people looking at low cost treatments there is an incentive for people to spend the time and expense to do the last bit of research.
got a link by any chance?Did some reading re Randy Oliver. Two American universities ran trials with his OA method but were unable to replicate his results.
Randy is in a very dry location.
squarepeg: Randy's results with Extended OA could not be replicated by Auburn University or the University of Georgia.
Science at work!
Have also seen the reverse where Randy was not getting the results others are getting. I believe his very dry climate has a lot to do with this. We need several more 'Randy's' scattered all over.
Well I have done some searching and cannot find the actual papers from the universities. However I did find this refence to it on another bee chat site, Beesource. Seems the 2 universities involved are Auburn University, and the University of Georgia.
It's one of the great things about America, they do spend a lot of money on scientific research.
i wonder if they are actually referring to that research.
a lot of the shop towel he did had poor results and that was fairly early on.The one I saw was in relation to shop towels with OA/GL mix on them, laid across the tops of the frames.
Which never worked for me BTW although it did not hurt the bees either.
info please.I've been using a stainless steel pot a candy thermometer, a polypail and the bathroom scales for three or four years with great results.
the thing is i have not seen anyone actually invent "the wheel". even the commercial product sold overseas people have complained that its killed hives. (it uses a high gly mix which would make it very hot).I can't help but feel that people are trying to reinvent the wheel
Ok..... 300 odd hives roughly 10% -20% winter losses from failed queens, drone layers. And ppb. Not varroa. Standard phill method 4.8kg glyce 3.2 kg ox heated 2 55 degrees in a stainless pot over a gassring. poured over 150 metres of single stitch triple laminate gib tape (the American made stuff) in a poly pail. Soak for 24 hours then flip the polypail and soak for another 24 hours. No "drying".Cut 2 30 cm and apply four staples in the guts of every brood box. Treat twice a year exactly the same timing as synthetics. Done. Have also used the beequip staples when it wasn't possible to source the American made gib tape with similar results. The first Autumn I used the staples I did notice alarmingly high bee mortality but this no longer happens, I think it takes a season for the bees to get used to the acid environment and this is why people give up on them. Downsides include a lot of mess on the baseboard and I do wonder about the long term health effects on the operator, oxalic is a nasty chemical and even with a face mask when handling the dry ingredient and plastic gloves when handling the finished product it is hard 2 not be exposed 2 it in some way. I would never handle the finished product without good quality gloves. Also I think the wheel was invented by a Argentinian called M Maggi in 2015 and was further refined by phill and others on the original oxalic staple forum in 2019. I also think randy Oliver's work is overrated and he missed a opportunity when his son suggested using strips instead of dishcloths and the like. I do wonder why so many experienced Beeks have had such devastating losses and why others have had such success possibly placement of staples and mucking up the recipe( measuring by volume instead of weight)I don't know. I don't think environment has any affect as people use these things all over the country and the world with success. Popping back down.
I would be interested to hear how the "old school staplers" are getting on ie pinnacle,Glynn,ikwezinz and particularly stoney , otto and philb. Is the pinkcat still using toilet roll cores?